
On 08/30/2018 03:32 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
Hi Marek,
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 1:07 AM Marek Vasut marek.vasut@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/29/2018 05:15 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
+Simon
Hi Marek,
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:22 PM Marek Vasut marek.vasut@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/24/2018 08:27 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
The PCI controller can have DT subnodes describing extra properties of particular PCI devices, ie. a PHY attached to an EHCI controller on a PCI bus. This patch parses those DT subnodes and assigns a node to the PCI device instance, so that the driver can extract details from that node and ie. configure the PHY using the PHY subsystem.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com Cc: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org Cc: Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com
Well, bump ?
This is the only missing patch to get my hardware working properly.
I don't think we ever had an agreement on the v1 patch. Simon had a long email that pointed out what Linux does seems like a 'fallback' to find a node with no compatible string.
Back to this, if we have to go with this way, please create a test case to cover this scenario.
The fact that it works on a particular board is not tested enough? Do we need a custom, special, synthetic test ?
I believe that's always been the requirement against the DM code changes. I was requested in the past when I changed something in the DM and I see other people were asked to do so. Like Alex said, it does not mean this patch was not tested enough, but to ensure future commits won't break this.
So, do you have any suggestion how to implement this test ? It seems Alex posed the same question. It doesn't seem to be trivial in the context of sandbox.
Anyway, any feedback on the patch ? Did you test it ? I again only see "do this random stuff and that random stuff" , but zero actual feedback.
If "this and that random stuff" means test case I asked for, please check my proposal on the v1 patch thread which indicated that a proper test case should be created. You seems to have missed that.
So, any feedback on this actual patch ?