Hi Graeme,
On Aug 11, 2012 11:43:39 PM, Graeme Russ wrote:
(added ML to Cc) Hi Benoît, On Aug 12, 2012 6:27 AM, "Benoît Thébaudeau" < benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com > wrote:
Hi Mike,
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 04:41:51 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 01:11:16 AM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:29:41 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear =?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt_Th=C3=A9baudeau?=,
In message < 845266616.705298.1343398892482.JavaMail.root@advansee.com > you wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 07:23:57 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > Acked-by: Mike Frysinger < vapier@gentoo.org >
If it's ack'ed, why does nobody apply it? What is the normal life cycle of patches like these that don't have a custodian?
They end on my table, and probably get merged when the next merge window opens. See http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/ReleaseCycle
Can you apply it now that the merge window is open?
Thanks in advance.
Can someone answer, please?
Do you have any idea why nobody applies this series and answers? Who is the fs custodian? Wolfgang since I can't find a custodian defined for fs, no? Is it because of vacations or something? I'd like if this series could be applied before the end of the current merge window.
It is probably somewhere in Wolfgang's todo list. The merge window is not an indicator of when patches must be applied, it's a submission cutoff date. As a general rule, as long as the patches are submitted before the window closes, they will go in the next release (unless they are nack'd or cause breakage). The best time to ping patches is during the RC cycle just prior to.the release.
Oh, great! This is good news. Thanks for the information. The merge window should be renamed to "submission window" or something since it is not really a merge window like for Linux. I was scared my patches got lost somewhere.
Best regards, Benoît