
8 Apr
2005
8 Apr
'05
12:21 a.m.
In message 9b7ca6570504062133713b09d2@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
On Apr 6, 2005 10:20 PM, Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de wrote:
Umm.. this seems bogus to me. If the actual size is != MAX_RAM_SIZE thenyou will have a hole in your mapping; this is not what you want to do. See the README how to handle such a situation.
Okay this sounds rather dumb, but I cant seem to find it anywhere in READMEs. Any hint ?
Read here:
[System Initialization:] ... Next, all (potentially) available memory banks are mapped using a preliminary mapping. For example, we put them on 512 MB boundaries ...
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
f u cn rd ths, itn tyg h myxbl cd.