Dear Loïc,
In message 20110628152416.GC31789@bee.dooz.org you wrote: ...
Board maintainers or other interested parties are requested to adapt their boards within the current merge window. All boards that have not been fixed within the first week of the merge window are considered unmaintained and without interest to the community and will be removed.
It's funny how this reminds me of package build failures in Debian; in such cases, we start by publishing the list of affected packages ideally with links to build logs and the name of corresponding maintainers. After a while, we actually start Cc:ing the maintainers or filing bug reports against each failing package.
This has started with v2010.09, and deadlines have been made clear. I have no intentions to discuss this much longer now. Either it builds, or it gets removed.
Would it make sense to publish such a list of broken boards and corresponding maintainers? (Maybe some makeall + scripts magic?)
No kind of script magic is needed. Just run "./MAKEALL arm".
And a list has been posted before. See
06/22 To:u-boot@lists.d [U-Boot] [STATUS] v2011.06-rc3 released
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/101894
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk