25 Apr
2011
25 Apr
'11
7:37 a.m.
On 22/04/11 22:46, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message 4DB15DD7.8050404@gmail.com you wrote:
I think it wouldbe even better if we could push our changes back into the "mainline" version of checkpatch, so that the U-Boot specific behaviour can beenabled by a command line option (checkpatch --uboot ?).
Forking is not so preferrable here, I think.
I agree, but if the Linux guys won't accept patches for U-Boot specific semantics, what choice do we have?
Did you ask him, and he refused, or is this just a hypothetical question?
I have now asked on LKML - Let's see what unfolds...
Regards,
Graeme