On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Xie Xiaobo X.Xie@freescale.com wrote:
SPANSION recommend S25FL128S supersedes S25FL129P, and the two flash memory have the same device ID and Memory architecture. So they can use the same config parameters.
Signed-off-by: Xie Xiaobo X.Xie@freescale.com
drivers/mtd/spi/spansion.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/spansion.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/spansion.c index 32b76e0..cfbd384 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/spansion.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/spansion.c @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static const struct spansion_spi_flash_params spansion_spi_flash_table[] = { .idcode2 = 0x4d01, .pages_per_sector = 256, .nr_sectors = 256,
.name = "S25FL129P_64K",
.name = "S25FL129P_64K/S25FL128S_64K", }, { .idcode1 = 0x2019,
Thanks for this patch, but Sent the same change with your name as author. no issues. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/247607/
-- Thanks, Jagan.