On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 21:54 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Peter Tyser,
In message 1247241800-29059-3-git-send-email-ptyser@xes-inc.com you wrote:
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser ptyser@xes-inc.com
Could you please rebase this patch, and the other two in this series: [PATCH v2 3/6] Move lib_generic to lib/generic [PATCH v2 4/6] Move libfdt to lib/libfdt
against current "next" branch?
Sure. There was some discussion that was spawned when this patch was originally sent and it sounded like the consensus was to add new arch/$ARCH directories instead of creating new lib/$ARCH directories. My personal preference would be to take it a step further and organize like:
/arch/$ARCH/ /lib/<sources currently in lib_$ARCH/> /include/asm/<headers currently in incluce/asm-$ARCH/> /cpu/<appropriate cpu directories in cpu/> /config.mk (old lib_$ARCH/config.mk)
/lib/ /<source files currently in lib_generic> /libfdt/ /lzma/ /lzo/
This layout would more closely match the Linux layout and is cleaner overall in my opinion. What do others think of this idea?
Here's the original discussion for reference: http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg17593.html
Best, Peter