On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 at 04:17:55 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 at 03:29:43 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Both of these chips have 256kB big sectors, thus the _256K suffix, compared to their _64K counterparts, which have 64kB sectors. Also, they have four times less sectors than their _64K counterparts.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marex@denx.de Cc: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki jaganna@xilinx.com
drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Note: Would be nice if someone actually tested this fix as I go by the
datasheet and by the old code that _was_ in U-Boot before the rework.btw. would be nice to get this one into current release to prevent it being broken. But I would _really_ appreciate some real-hardware testing here.
Yes - I'll try it and let us know.
Thanks!
Tested on S25FL256S_256K, works fine!