
17 Jun
2012
17 Jun
'12
7:49 p.m.
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Stefano Babic sbabic@denx.de wrote:
I like that there will be support for i.MX23, too. But I dislike that everything takes the name "MX28". As you suggest in your subject, maybe it is time to rename directories, and use "mxs" (as in kernel) instead of mx28.
I have it in my wip branch; I'd like to hold it until I have mx23 working so I have freedom to rework the patches.
I can split it on mx28 part and leave mx23 on my branch; this does looks nicer for me.
+static u8 get_cpu_rev(void) +{
- struct mx28_digctl_regs *digctl_regs =
- (struct mx28_digctl_regs *)MXS_DIGCTL_BASE;
- return readl(&digctl_regs->hw_digctl_chipid) & 0x0000F;
+}
Everywhere (i.MX, omap, ...) get_cpu_rev returns u32. The function is currently exported, too.
I change it then.
Will fix it.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br