On 10/8/2012 6:54 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 05/10/2012 01:28, Troy Kisky wrote:
On 10/3/2012 8:00 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Troy Kisky troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com wrote:
The prompt is not appropriate if not running on a mx6q processor.
Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com
But in this case the board name will change, no?
No, patch 29/32 sets the new boards to use the same config file (mx6qsabrelite.h) only adding ",MX6DL" or ",MX6S" or ",MX6Q" to the end of the line in boards.cfg
This means that CONFIG_MX6Dx is set. You can use it to set appropriately the prompt or use a more generic name including the board name, as "MX6SABRELITE U-Boot > ". The board is always the same, what is
I can live with "MX6SABRELITE U-Boot" but I prefer a plain "U-Boot". The rest seems a waste of screen real estate. The long u-boot commands are more likely to wrap. Anyone else have an opinion???
Thanks Troy