On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:35:26PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hello Thierry,
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:17:18 +0200, Thierry Reding thierry.reding@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 01:48:45PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
+Scott, Masahiro
Hi Thierry,
On 25 March 2015 at 17:23, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Thierry,
On 8 September 2014 at 09:02, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
Applied to u-boot-fdt/next, thanks!
Did you submit these patches to dtc upstream? I don't see them applied.
Ping? Masahiro has now sent a series on top of your patches, so we need to sort this out.
I sent these to the DTC maintainers and the list, with you and Masahiro in Cc. They patches should be eqivalent to what's in U-Boot except for the node parameter that I renamed nodeoffset for consistency with libfdt and the testsuite bits.
Do you mean there are intrinsic incompatibilities between U-Boot and Linux that make it impossible to use the same name in both?
No, I don't think so. Back at the time I must have assumed that node was the consistent name used in U-Boot, but it seems like these string functions are now the only ones in libfdt that use this. I'd expect that to fix itself when libfdt gets sync'ed back from the upstream copy.
Thierry