
Hello,
On 08/07/2015 10:43 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
If there is no property named 'regulator-name' for regulators, choose node name instead, but not directly return failure value.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan Peng.Fan@freescale.com Cc: Przemyslaw Marczak p.marczak@samsung.com Cc: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
Changes v3: None.
Changes v2: None. The comments update patch, see 3/6.
drivers/power/regulator/regulator-uclass.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/power/regulator/regulator-uclass.c b/drivers/power/regulator/regulator-uclass.c index 12e141b..d4f06d5 100644 --- a/drivers/power/regulator/regulator-uclass.c +++ b/drivers/power/regulator/regulator-uclass.c @@ -256,7 +256,9 @@ static int regulator_post_bind(struct udevice *dev) if (!uc_pdata->name) { debug("%s: dev: %s has no property 'regulator-name'\n", __func__, dev->name);
return -EINVAL;
uc_pdata->name = fdt_get_name(blob, offset, NULL);
if (!uc_pdata->name)
return -EINVAL;
}
if (regulator_name_is_unique(dev, uc_pdata->name))
Applied to: u-boot-pmic.
Best regards,