
12 Dec
2011
12 Dec
'11
1:08 a.m.
Hi Stefano,
thanks for posting this. There is a couple of comments below.
On 11.12.2011 21:22, Stefano Babic wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_spl_simple.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_spl_simple.c index ed821f2..a3d1af0 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_spl_simple.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_spl_simple.c @@ -145,9 +145,9 @@ static int nand_is_bad_block(int block) static int nand_read_page(int block, int page, uchar *dst) { struct nand_chip *this = mtd.priv;
- u_char *ecc_calc;
- u_char *ecc_code;
- u_char *oob_data;
- u_char ecc_calc[CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ECCSTEPS * CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ECCBYTES];
- u_char ecc_code[CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ECCTOTAL];
Doesn't ECCTOTAL always equal to ECCSTEPS * ECCBYTES?
- u_char oob_data[CONFIG_SYS_NAND_OOBSIZE];
I think we can save a few bytes by placing ecc_code and oob_data into a union. We only need oob_data to get ecc_code...
Regards, Ilya.