It seems like the P5 header was not present on "Model B" any board prior to Revision 2.0, there's no need for a separate device tree.
Also, it looks like "rev2" is incorrectly used to only cover the 512MiB memory models; there also were 256MiB 2.0 boards.
I don't have all of the boards to check this, I'm following this table: http://elinux.org/RPi_HardwareHistory#Board_Revision_History --- board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c b/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c index 4b80d7b..b344362 100644 --- a/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c +++ b/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c @@ -110,28 +110,28 @@ static const struct rpi_model rpi_models_new_scheme[] = {
static const struct rpi_model rpi_models_old_scheme[] = { [0x2] = { - "Model B (no P5)", - "bcm2835-rpi-b-i2c0.dtb", + "Model B", + "bcm2835-rpi-b.dtb", true, }, [0x3] = { - "Model B (no P5)", - "bcm2835-rpi-b-i2c0.dtb", + "Model B", + "bcm2835-rpi-b.dtb", true, }, [0x4] = { - "Model B", - "bcm2835-rpi-b.dtb", + "Model B rev2", + "bcm2835-rpi-b-rev2.dtb", true, }, [0x5] = { - "Model B", - "bcm2835-rpi-b.dtb", + "Model B rev2", + "bcm2835-rpi-b-rev2.dtb", true, }, [0x6] = { - "Model B", - "bcm2835-rpi-b.dtb", + "Model B rev2", + "bcm2835-rpi-b-rev2.dtb", true, }, [0x7] = {