2008/6/16 Jerry Van Baren <
gerald.vanbaren@ge.com>:
Michal Simek wrote:
Hi Antonio
I am not responsible for this part of U-BOOT but your patch contain coding style
violation.
Regards,
Michal Simek
Logic unit:
Purpose: Add support for bare partitions (no partition table)
Author: Antnoio R. Costa <antonio.costa <at> atmel.com>
Date : 11 Jun 2008
Status:
~~~~~~
Some SD cards are not formatted with a partition table but with
just a bare partition at the beginnig of the memory.
I modified get_partition_info_extended to call test_block_type
as done by print_partition_extended. In this way bare FAT partitions
are recognised. Now we need a test for Ext2.
Signed-off-by: Antonio R. Costa <antonio.costa@atmel.com>
diff --git a/disk/part_dos.c b/disk/part_dos.c
index 4d778ec..e5cc8aa 100644
--- a/disk/part_dos.c
+++ b/disk/part_dos.c
[snip]
+static inline int le16_to_int(unsigned char *le16)
+{
+ return ((le16[1] << 8) + le16[0]);
+}
+
this should be in header file
Please use <asm/byteorder.h> rather than making Yet Another Define. Note that the subdirectory asm gets symlinked to the appropriate arch-specific subdirectory and then the right endian munching is selected and it Just Works[tm].
PowerPC example:
<http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=blob;f=include/asm-ppc/byteorder.h;h=3f5bcf63a1f980eb0c5e95e458119f55f5855274;hb=HEAD>
Telling the truth it seems that I've used this function during debug in fact at a deeper look it seems it disappeared from the code a part the definition.
Ok I'm going to fix the problem and re-submit.
In these cases is there a special manner to format the subject to make an explicit reference to a patched patch :) ?
Regards,
Antonio
[snip]
Regards,
Michal Simek
Thanks,
gvb