In message 437BBA6A.7080708@mc.com you wrote:
I understand that U-Boot development and source is now management using "git". Since the cvs tree does seem to be pretty recent, is it ok to
The git and CVS trees are 100% in sync. All commits on the git tree have been checked in in parallel on the CVS tree, too.
Perhaps you might be so kind as to elucidate why you think the CVS tree might not be up to date?
pull the latest U-Boot source from the cvs tree? Or is there less risk of missing important code patches by using git?
The code is exactly the same.
After several failures at building git for my RH7.2 system, I decided to go back to using cvs - it just works!
Ummm.. RH7.2 is pretty old, with a list of known andunfixed exploits. If I were you I would consider to update my development host system insted.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk