
Hi Neil,
On 10/09/24 14:50, Neil Armstrong wrote:
Align the allocation size with DMA_MINALIGN to make sure we do not flush/invalidate data from following allocations.
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong neil.armstrong@linaro.org
drivers/ufs/ufs.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/ufs.c b/drivers/ufs/ufs.c index be64bf971f1..e005cc90608 100644 --- a/drivers/ufs/ufs.c +++ b/drivers/ufs/ufs.c @@ -633,7 +633,9 @@ static int ufshcd_memory_alloc(struct ufs_hba *hba) /* Allocate one Transfer Request Descriptor * Should be aligned to 1k boundary. */
- hba->utrdl = memalign(1024, sizeof(struct utp_transfer_req_desc));
- hba->utrdl = memalign(1024,
ALIGN(sizeof(struct utp_transfer_req_desc),
if (!hba->utrdl) { dev_err(hba->dev, "Transfer Descriptor memory allocation failed\n"); return -ENOMEM;ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN));
@@ -642,7 +644,9 @@ static int ufshcd_memory_alloc(struct ufs_hba *hba) /* Allocate one Command Descriptor * Should be aligned to 1k boundary. */
- hba->ucdl = memalign(1024, sizeof(struct utp_transfer_cmd_desc));
- hba->ucdl = memalign(1024,
ALIGN(sizeof(struct utp_transfer_cmd_desc),
if (!hba->ucdl) { dev_err(hba->dev, "Command descriptor memory allocation failed\n"); return -ENOMEM;ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN));
Reviewed-by: Neha Malcom Francis n-francis@ti.com
Sorry for the delay in sending out this review, I had reviewed the first few patches that you had send in an earlier version and looks like this cleanup/fix was needed. Thanks!