28 Aug
2019
28 Aug
'19
11:05 p.m.
Hi Doug,
Some comments on the actual mechanics here (vs. on the kernel list I picked this up from).
It seems like perhaps you could increase the "count" variable. You got:
20190828132723.0.RFC.Ie6289f437ae533d7fcaddfcee9202f0e92c6b2b9@changeid
but usually patches are numbered starting from 1, not 0. Especially for series, it might be easier to understand if that was the same here.
I'd probably also put it after the tag, so you'd have "RFC.1" instead of "0.RFC", I'm saying it mostly because I originally thought you somehow generated a timestamp with a decimal point :-)
Obviously none of that really matters, but it'd be easier to understand (and if necessary reverse-engineer) IMHO.
johannes