
-----Original Message----- From: Trent Piepho tpiepho@impinj.com Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 10:03 AM To: Henry Beberman Henry.Beberman@microsoft.com; u- boot@lists.denx.de Cc: fabio.estevam@nxp.com; adrian.alonso@nxp.com Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/11] mx7dsabresd: Add Windows boot support for iMX7 Sabre
On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 01:41 +0000, Henry Beberman wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Trent Piepho tpiepho@impinj.com Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 11:22 AM To: Henry Beberman Henry.Beberman@microsoft.com; u- boot@lists.denx.de Cc: fabio.estevam@nxp.com; adrian.alonso@nxp.com Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/11] mx7dsabresd: Add Windows boot support for iMX7 Sabre
On Sat, 2018-07-14 at 00:11 +0000, Henry Beberman wrote:
From: Henry Beberman henry.beberman@microsoft.com
This patch adds a new bootable configuration for Windows 10 IoT Core on the i.MX7 Dual Sabre board.
It enables SPL on the i.MX7 Sabre in order to support the FIT load of OP-TEE and U-Boot proper.
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Makefile b/drivers/gpio/Makefile index f186120684..3fb9b72703 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/Makefile +++ b/drivers/gpio/Makefile @@ -7,10 +7,13 @@ ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD obj-$(CONFIG_DWAPB_GPIO) += dwapb_gpio.o obj-$(CONFIG_AXP_GPIO) += axp_gpio.o endif
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_$(SPL_TPL_)DM),y) obj-$(CONFIG_DM_GPIO) += gpio-uclass.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DM_PCA953X) += pca953x_gpio.o obj-$(CONFIG_DM_74X164) += 74x164_gpio.o +endif
It doesn't look like this patch is specific to mx7 or Windows. Perhaps it should be in a different commit?
I agree that this change probably belongs in its own patch. I've left it in this patch so far because it's required to build the new
mx7dsabresd_nt_defconfig.
Easy enough to split out and put first. The person on different hardware trying to figure out the u-boot build spaghetti it's helped much knowing the person who added it was working on windows 10 support, but nothing about the reason for this change.
Also, the help text for SPL_DM says it turns on basic DM support in SPL. But not any specific hardware drivers. Those all have additional config options to turn them on. It doesn't seems right to bundle a selection of GPIO drivers along with CONFIG_SPL_DM.
This issue has cropped up because this patch adds SPL support to
mx7dsabresd, but intentionally does not enable SPL_DM.
The defconfig contains CONFIG_DM_74X164 for use in U-Boot Proper, but
because drivers/gpio/Makefile also runs during the SPL portion of the build that config still pulls in the 74X164 driver which fails to build due to missing dependencies.
Wrapping the DM objects in CONFIG_$(SPL_TPL_)DM ensures that DM is
actually enabled for the current portion of the build when deciding to build the DM drivers.
But isn't it odd that not a single other driver is wrapped this way? What's special here?
I think the underlying flaw is the the kbuild system doesn't support the concept of building multiple times in different modes, e.g. main, SPL, TPL. And rather than design something, one gets layers of board specific hacks.
There are a few other instances of omitting DM drivers from SPL due to size concerns, see drivers/power/regulator/Makefile (commit a35332f) and drivers/mmc/Makefile (commit c4d660d)
However instead of wrapping the block in CONFIG_$(SPL_TPL_)DM, the intended way is to include $(SPL_) in line with the driver you need to disable for SPL. - obj-$(CONFIG_DM_74X164) += 74x164_gpio.o + obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_)DM_74X164) += 74x164_gpio.o
I'll switch to this in-line method and split out this change into a separate patch so the commit message explains it in isolation.
Thanks, Henry