On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Rob Herring robh@kernel.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Linus Walleij linus.walleij@linaro.org wrote:
The MAINTAINERS entry for device tree bindings does not state a git tree and I've never seen any of the maintainers send a pull request for DT binding files. (Beat me up properly if you have, guys.) I've seen Grant send some at times.
Err, what?
$ git log --merges --grep='Pull.*(Herring|Likely)' --oneline Documentation/devicetree/
OK nice, bad research from me. My sloppy statement was based on this:
OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE M: Rob Herring robh+dt@kernel.org M: Frank Rowand frowand.list@gmail.com M: Grant Likely grant.likely@linaro.org L: devicetree@vger.kernel.org W: http://www.devicetree.org/ T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/glikely/linux.git S: Maintained F: drivers/of/ F: include/linux/of*.h F: scripts/dtc/
The DT core code and bindings (which don't go thru subsystem trees) go together.
I guess I should just send a patch adding
F: Documentation/devicetree/*
...and hope things get better from that.
I suggest sending U-Boot DT bindings to not only devicetree@vger.kernel.org but also, as indicated, to Jon Corbet and linux-doc.
I'd suggest devicetree-spec@vger for common things. Perhaps we need a better name, but the whole point of this was to separate the common issues from the firehose and have multiple OS participation.
Hm, wasn't devicetree@vger.kernel.org supposed to be for that?
If noone cares to comment in two weeks, Jon can merge them, breaking the status quo on external DT bindings.
Did someone tell Jon to drink from that firehose?
I'm sorry, I guess this whole mail was something I wrote in light panic over the increasing threat from the separatists.
Yours, Linus Walleij