On 9/9/20 4:05 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 10:02 PM Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
On 9/9/20 3:46 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 7:05 PM Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
On 9/9/20 3:55 AM, Bin Meng wrote:
Hi Marek,
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 12:15 AM Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
On 9/8/20 5:45 PM, Bin Meng wrote: > Hi Marek,
Hi,
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 7:13 PM Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote: >> >> On 9/8/20 3:44 AM, Bin Meng wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 3:14 PM Chunfeng Yun chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com wrote: >>>> >>>> Use readx_poll_sleep_timeout() to poll the register status >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com >>>> --- >>>> v3: no changes >>>> >>>> v2: fix typo of title suggested by Frank >>>> --- >>>> drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 25 +++++++++++-------------- >>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >>>> >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com >> >> Thanks. So now I have half of a RESEND patchset with RB tags, and >> another half of just RB tags without patchset. Can someone of you please >> collect the tags and resend the patchset once more with the collected >> tags, so it's all in one place ? >> > > I believe the latest version has all the RB tags.
Thank you, I cannot apply a patchset which only has "Re:" in my mailbox, because the original patches are just not there.
You can use patchwork to help the custodian work. I found it very helpful to download the patches from patchwork and apply.
Can you also comment on patches via patchwork ?
I mean, really, can we please just stick to the usual workflow ? That's all I am asking for , nothing else, nothing new.
I don't understand the question about "usual workflow". You asked "I cannot apply a patchset which only has "Re:" in my mailbox" and I recommended patchwork which will satisfy the requirement of what you asked.
Right, I can, but if there is more I want to say about the patch, I cannot do it with patchwork. Then I need the patch, which I don't have. Hence my remark about the usual email-based workflow.
Yes, that's true. If we need to post comments about patches, we will have to use email.
The problem here is that for whatever reason, I didn't receive the original patches, Frank had to resend them, then I got RBs on some of each and it was a mess. I'd just like to get back to the usual. I think we agree, don't we ?
Anyway, thanks for the RBs, that really helped.