6 Dec
2012
6 Dec
'12
4:59 a.m.
It looks good to me. Added minor comment.
Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung jh80.chung@samsung.com
On 12/05/2012 10:31 PM, Amar wrote:
The current implementation of fifo size computation was giving improper values for eMMC channel. Modified the computation as per user manual.
Signed-off-by: Amarendra Reddy amarendra.xt@samsung.com
drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c index 4070d4e..62dc152 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c @@ -332,6 +332,8 @@ static int dwmci_init(struct mmc *mmc) dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_BMOD, 1);
fifo_size = dwmci_readl(host, DWMCI_FIFOTH);
- fifo_size = ((fifo_size & RX_WMARK(0xFFF)) >> 16) + 1;
How about using like FIFO_SIZE_MASK?
- if (host->fifoth_val) fifoth_val = host->fifoth_val; else