Hi Simon,
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 8:20 PM Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Bin,
I'm looking at Apollo Lake and it seems to use a newer FSP version (2.0). The API differences seem to be fairly minor but the packaging seems a little more complicated.
I have investigated FSP 2.0 architecture before, and IIRC your understanding is correct. Unfortunately I did not get a chance to support one of the Apollo Lake CRB.
I'm thinking of introducing a Kconfig for this and moving the existing fsp implementation into an arch/x86/lib/fsp1 directory and adding an fsp2 there also. What do you think? Have you done anything with this newer version?
Sounds good to me. I have a Oxbow Hill CRB here. If it is the same board you want to support, I can help testing.
Regards, Bin