7 Aug
2010
7 Aug
'10
11:25 p.m.
Dear Reinhard Meyer,
In message 4C5CA269.8010401@emk-elektronik.de you wrote:
considering that both AVR32 and AT91 share most of the peripheral hardware building blocks, and therefore share the drivers, it seems to make sense to have an atmel custodian tree instead of avr32 and at91. Each change to a shared driver must (at least with MAKEALL) be checked for both architectures and adding it to both trees would make life unnecessary complicated...
I'm fine with that.
You take this, then? :-)
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
"...one of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that,
lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of
their C programs." - Robert Firth