
Am 2021-01-13 19:05, schrieb Claudiu Manoil:
From: Alex Marginean alexandru.marginean@nxp.com
The definition follows the DSA binding in kernel and describes the switch, its ports and PHYs. ENETC PF6 is the 2nd Eth controller linked to the switch on LS1028A, it is not used in U-Boot and was disabled. Ethernet port aliases were also added to better manage the multitude of ports available now, and to enforce the order in which master and slave ports are probed.
Signed-off-by: Alex Marginean alexandru.marginean@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil claudiu.manoil@nxp.com
arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts index 85b4815b2e..92d83a5c0c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts +++ b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts @@ -131,9 +131,45 @@ phy-handle = <&rdb_phy0>; };
+ðsw_ports {
- port@0 {
status = "okay";
phy-mode = "qsgmii";
phy-handle = <&sw_phy0>;
- };
- port@1 {
status = "okay";
phy-mode = "qsgmii";
phy-handle = <&sw_phy1>;
- };
- port@2 {
status = "okay";
phy-mode = "qsgmii";
phy-handle = <&sw_phy2>;
- };
- port@3 {
status = "okay";
phy-mode = "qsgmii";
phy-handle = <&sw_phy3>;
- };
+};
&mdio0 { status = "okay"; rdb_phy0: phy@2 { reg = <2>; };
- sw_phy0: phy@10 {
reg = <0x10>;
- };
- sw_phy1: phy@11 {
reg = <0x11>;
- };
- sw_phy2: phy@12 {
reg = <0x12>;
- };
- sw_phy3: phy@13 {
reg = <0x13>;
- };
}; diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi index d0850237c7..e73769392f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi @@ -14,6 +14,17 @@ #address-cells = <2>; #size-cells = <2>;
- aliases {
eth0 = &enetc0;
eth1 = &enetc1;
eth2 = &enetc2;
eth3 = &enetc6;
eth4 = &felix0;
eth5 = &felix1;
eth6 = &felix2;
eth7 = &felix3;
- };
Don't include the aliases in the common dtsi. There are serveral reasons for that: (1) it is really board dependent. not every board has all these ports. (2) it will mess up the device numbering for boards which use this dtsi. And with this it will also mess up the ethNaddr environment variable logic.
Please move them into the corresponding boards.
- sysclk: sysclk { compatible = "fixed-clock"; #clock-cells = <0>;
@@ -151,9 +162,51 @@ reg = <0x000300 0 0 0 0>; status = "disabled"; };
ethsw: pci@0,5 {
#address-cells=<0>;
#size-cells=<1>;
reg = <0x000500 0 0 0 0>;
ethsw_ports: ports {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
felix0: port@0 {
reg = <0>;
status = "disabled";
label = "swp0";
};
felix1: port@1 {
reg = <1>;
status = "disabled";
label = "swp1";
};
felix2: port@2 {
reg = <2>;
status = "disabled";
label = "swp2";
};
felix3: port@3 {
reg = <3>;
status = "disabled";
label = "swp3";
};
port@4 {
reg = <4>;
phy-mode = "internal";
status = "okay";
ethernet = <&enetc2>;
};
status = "disabled".
Why would you enable just this port if all the switch ports are disabled.
port@5 {
reg = <5>;
phy-mode = "internal";
status = "disabled";
};
};
enetc6: pci@0,6 { reg = <0x000600 0 0 0 0>;};
status = "okay";
}; };status = "disabled"; phy-mode = "internal";
-michael