Hi Simon,
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 07:02:25 -0700 Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Masahiro,
On 20 February 2015 at 19:37, Masahiro YAMADA yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
2015-02-21 11:28 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org:
Hi Masahiro,
On 20 February 2015 at 17:54, Masahiro YAMADA yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com wrote:
Hi Simon, Stephen,
2015-02-21 3:39 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org:
Hi,
On 20 February 2015 at 10:54, Stephen Warren swarren@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 02/20/2015 10:06 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > > +Stephen > > Hi Masahiro, > > On 19 February 2015 at 22:25, Masahiro Yamada yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com > wrote: >> >> Now CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is not defined in Kconfig, so >> "!depends on SPL_BUILD" and "if !SPL_BUILD" are redundant.
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig >> index 41f3220..700e2a8 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig >> @@ -739,9 +739,8 @@ config TEGRA >> bool "NVIDIA Tegra" >> select SUPPORT_SPL >> select SPL >> - select OF_CONTROL if !SPL_BUILD >> - select CPU_ARM720T if SPL_BUILD >> - select CPU_V7 if !SPL_BUILD >> + select OF_CONTROL >> + select CPU_V7 > > > Sorry if I have missed something here. On Tegra most unfortunately the > SPL uses ARMv4t and U-Boot proper uses ARMv7. In fact that is the only > reason that Tegra has SPL. Doesn't this change with this commit?
No. I think behavior is still the same as before.
In a single .config, we cannot define two CPUs in Kconfig.
So, we only define CPU_V7, for the main processors.
For SPL, we override the "CPU" in config.mk
ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD ifdef CONFIG_TEGRA CPU := arm720t endif endif
I know what you might be saying is, this is too ugly. Yes.
I think we can do a little better with further rafactoring, but the basic idea is, SPL of Tegra is a special case.
Yes I saw that, I understand now. So SPL_BUILD is no longer available in Kconfig, but is still available in Makefiles, right?
Yes, exactly!
This all works fine on Tegra for me. However I like to suggest dropping a few patches in this series.
I don't think it is worth using ARCH_MALLOC_F_LEN. In fact for me the Tegra defconfig looks OK and SPL is built correctly.
My remaining question is about that Tegra seems to want USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC for SPL but not for U-Boot. I'm not sure why, nor whether it matters. It seems to work find using it for both.
I have pushed my tested tree to u-boot-x86 in branch single-kconfig-for-masahiro.
It contains only these patches:
ARM: UniPhier: set CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F to the global default value kconfig: Adjust ordering so that defaults work as expected kconfig: switch to single .config configuration kconfig: remove unneeded dependency on !SPL_BUILD
Perhaps we can look at the others later once we get things moved over? I think the SYS_MALLOC_F thing is not that big a deal and not urgent to resolve if we still have a problem.
OK. Let's go with these four.
Including SYS_MALLOC_F things makes the point of this series blurred.
I have just posted v5.
Mashiro Yamada