On 08/06/13 13:40, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Mateusz Zalega,
In message 1375786242-11734-1-git-send-email-m.zalega@samsung.com you wrote:
Current implementation of do_dfu() and do_usb_mass_storage() requires board-specific board_usb_init() which performs USB hardware initialization.
I noticed that several boards have such a function defined, named either usb_board_init() (which binds to ohci-hcd.c driver and had been used solely by it) or board_usb_init() (as in ehci-omap.c). I _assumed_ that these functions do what's required by do_*() and renamed the earlier in order to unify the naming convention.
I appreciate your efforts, but this whole area clearly falls into the domain of the device model rework. Is your suggested implementation in any way synchronized with what has been discussed about this topic before?
Hello,
I've caught up with driver model discussion. The changes I submitted are related to sharing of board-specific hardware initialization functions between drivers, therefore my patches, if I don't miss anything, do not collide with driver model rework - these changes would have to be done anyway.
Regards,