On 6/2/2023 2:34 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report this email' button
On 6/2/23 08:45, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
From: Peng Fan peng.fan@nxp.com
i.MX8MN/P has Cortex-M7, i.MX93 has Cortex-M33, so use "M4" is a bit misleading, so update the name of the macro
Signed-off-by: faqiang.zhu faqiang.zhu@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Peng Fan peng.fan@nxp.com
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-imx8m/imx-regs.h | 2 +- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h | 2 +- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx7/imx-regs.h | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-imx/imx9/imx_bootaux.c | 6 +++--- arch/arm/mach-imx/imx_bootaux.c | 24 +++++++++++----------- board/kontron/sl-mx8mm/sl-mx8mm.c | 2 +- board/kontron/sl-mx8mm/spl.c | 2 +- board/technexion/pico-imx8mq/pico-imx8mq.c | 2 +- board/technexion/pico-imx8mq/spl.c | 2 +- include/imx_sip.h | 6 +++---
I haven't had my coffee yet, so please pardon my ignorance, but which of the boards that are being patched in this patch are iMX8MN/MP ?
I mean to use a generic name _MCU_ for i.MX8M* and i.MX93.
i.MX8MQ/M has M4 i.MX8MN/P has M7 i.MX93 has M33.
So the macro name _M4_ would be a bit misleading.
Thanks, Peng.