26 Jun
2003
26 Jun
'03
4:03 a.m.
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:08:00 +1000, Vuong My-Hong My-Hong.Vuong@au.thalesgroup.com writes:
Hi Murray,
Is there a similar fix for gcc 3.0.4?
Thanks, My Hong
Sorry, I wouldn't know. Here is a posting where this define was proposed (14 Dec 2001) ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-12/msg01678.html
and here is a post where it was proposed that the define be turned off in "linux.h" (29 Jan 2003) ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-01/msg02345.html
If the second is before gcc 3.0.4, then this fix will apply, otherwise you have some other problem. 3.0.4 sounds like a long time ago, so my guess would be "no (you could check in the gcc cvs). Cheers! Murray...
--
Murray Jensen, CSIRO Manufacturing & Infra. Tech. Phone: +61 3 9662 7763
Locked Bag No. 9, Preston, Vic, 3072, Australia. Fax: +61 3 9662 7853
Internet: Murray.Jensen@csiro.au
Hymod project: http://www.msa.cmst.csiro.au/projects/Hymod/
To the extent permitted by law, CSIRO does not represent, warrant and/or
guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or
that the communication is free of errors, virus, interception or interference.
The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential or privileged.
Any unauthorised use or disclosure is prohibited. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please delete it immediately and notify Murray Jensen on
+61 3 9662 7763. Thank you.