
18 Mar
2015
18 Mar
'15
8:52 a.m.
Hi Matt,
On Feb 23, 2015, at 23:52 , Matt Reimer mreimer@sdgsystems.com wrote:
Properly mask SELBASECLK by using an actual mask rather than the number of bits to shift in order to create the mask.
Signed-off-by: Matt Reimer mreimer@sdgsystems.com
drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c index 3899372..0eec731 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static void s5p_sdhci_set_control_reg(struct sdhci_host *host) sdhci_writel(host, SDHCI_CTRL4_DRIVE_MASK(0x3), SDHCI_CONTROL4);
val = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_CONTROL2);
- val &= SDHCI_CTRL2_SELBASECLK_SHIFT;
val &= SDHCI_CTRL2_SELBASECLK_MASK(3);
val |= SDHCI_CTRL2_ENSTAASYNCCLR | SDHCI_CTRL2_ENCMDCNFMSK |
-- 1.7.9.5
Thanks, applied.
— Pantelis