Dear Łukasz Dałek,
On 03.10.2012 02:25, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Łukasz Dałek,
On 03.10.2012 02:18, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Łukasz Dałek,
On 03.10.2012 02:06, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Lukasz Dalek,
> Add support for ethernet over USB which can be used for e.g. booting > process. It works with tftp and dhcp clients code. > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Dalekluk0104@gmail.com > --- > > Changes for v5: > - Surrendered #include<usb.h> with CONFIGs > > board/h2200/h2200.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > boards.cfg | 1 + > include/configs/h2200.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
[...]
> diff --git a/boards.cfg b/boards.cfg > index ab10938..a03a469 100644 > --- a/boards.cfg > +++ b/boards.cfg > @@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ pdnb3 arm ixp > pdnb3 prodriv scpu arm > ixp > > pdnb3 prodrive - pdnb3:SCPU > balloon3 > > arm pxa > > h2200 arm pxa > > +h2200_usbeth arm pxa h2200 > > -
I told you to enable the USB ethernet by default, so why do you add this board?
I don't understand. We agreed to split h2200 support into two parts. First one adding basic support for device, second one adding support for usb ethernet for h2200.
Yes, but I fail to understand why you need TWO board entries for that. Adding the USB ethernet support is just a feature, you don't need additional board entry for that ... so what is the idea behind adding it?
Because easier is to type make h2200_usbeth_config than modifiy config.
Why don't you enable the USB ethernet by default for "h2200" target then?
Best regards, Marek Vasut
I will enable. This two entries really look weird.
Ok, so we're clear there'll be one entry with ethernet enabled called "h2200", yes?
Best regards, Marek Vasut