
Hi Paul,
On 11/20/24 10:49 AM, Paul Barker wrote:
Micrel KSZ9131 PHY LED behavior is not correct when configured in Individual Mode, LED1 (Activity LED) is in the ON state when there is no-link.
Workaround this by setting bit 9 of register 0x1e after verifying that the LED configuration is Individual Mode.
This issue is described in KSZ9131RNX Silicon Errata DS80000693B [*] and according to that it will not be corrected in a future silicon revision.
[*] https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/KSZ9131RNX-Silicon-Errata-a...
Based on commit 0316c7e66bbd in the Linux kernel.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker paul.barker.ct@bp.renesas.com
Changes v1->v2:
- Split out of series adding RZ/G2L Ethernet support [1]
- Add symbols KSZ9131RN_COMMON_CTRL, KSZ9131RN_COMMON_CTRL_LED_MODE, KSZ9131RN_LED_ERRATA_REG, KSZ9131RN_LED_ERRATA_BITS
drivers/net/phy/micrel_ksz90x1.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/micrel_ksz90x1.c b/drivers/net/phy/micrel_ksz90x1.c index c48ae6e88f30..b33457910795 100644 --- a/drivers/net/phy/micrel_ksz90x1.c +++ b/drivers/net/phy/micrel_ksz90x1.c @@ -389,6 +389,12 @@ U_BOOT_PHY_DRIVER(ksz9031) = { #define KSZ9131RN_DLL_ENABLE_DELAY 0 #define KSZ9131RN_DLL_DISABLE_DELAY BIT(12)
+#define KSZ9131RN_COMMON_CTRL 0 +#define KSZ9131RN_COMMON_CTRL_LED_MODE BIT(4)
Can you rename or add a new symbol to explain what is what? This implies a mask basically but not what the mask being set means.
Can suggest something like:
KSZ9131RN_COMMON_CTRL_INDIVIDUAL_LED_MODE ....
+#define KSZ9131RN_LED_ERRATA_REG 0x1e +#define KSZ9131RN_LED_ERRATA_BITS BIT(9)
Yet we only set one bit, remove BITS or rename to BIT?
- static int ksz9131_config_rgmii_delay(struct phy_device *phydev) { struct phy_driver *drv = phydev->drv;
@@ -436,6 +442,28 @@ static int ksz9131_config_rgmii_delay(struct phy_device *phydev) return ret; }
+/* Silicon Errata DS80000693B
- When LEDs are configured in Individual Mode, LED1 is ON in a no-link
- condition. Workaround is to set register 0x1e, bit 9, this way LED1 behaves
- according to the datasheet (off if there is no link).
- */
+static int ksz9131_led_errata(struct phy_device *phydev) +{
- int reg;
- reg = phy_read_mmd(phydev, KSZ9131RN_MMD_COMMON_CTRL_REG,
KSZ9131RN_COMMON_CTRL);
- if (reg < 0)
return reg;
- if (!(reg & KSZ9131RN_COMMON_CTRL_LED_MODE))
.... or at the very least add a clear comment here what we're after :) (yes it's commented at the top of the function but right before the check is nice too I believe).
return 0;
- return phy_set_bits(phydev, MDIO_DEVAD_NONE, KSZ9131RN_LED_ERRATA_REG,
KSZ9131RN_LED_ERRATA_BITS);
+}
- static int ksz9131_config(struct phy_device *phydev) { int ret;
@@ -446,6 +474,10 @@ static int ksz9131_config(struct phy_device *phydev) return ret; }
- ret = ksz9131_led_errata(phydev);
- if (ret < 0)
return ret;
This seems to work but is happening a bit late.
Indeed, I need something to call the network stack for this to be happening. Meaning until I e.g. run `dhcp` in the CLI, the LED is still following the bad behavior.
I assume we cannot use the probe() callback for writing to registers?
Tested-by: Quentin Schulz quentin.schulz@cherry.de # RK3588 Tiger
Thanks! Quentin