u-boot-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
Hello,
I would like to get your general opinion about changing the U-Boot version numbering scheme.
To be honest, I never really understood myself how this is supposed to work and if the next version should be 1.3.4 or 1.4.0 or 2.0.0, i. e. which changes / additions are important enough to increment the PATCHLEVEL or even VERSION number.
I therefor suggest to drop this style of version numbering and change to a timestamp based version number system which has been quite successfully used by other projects (like Ubuntu) or is under discussion (for Linux).
Hi, IMHO I think it is best to stick with the same version numbering scheme that you started with, even if it is not perfect. The alternative timestamp scheme is not perfect either. You can probably find as many advantages for one as for the other, and the same goes for the disadvantages.
Even when using timestamp schemes, people often attach numerical version numbers when refering to some releases. That would probably the case for the U-Boot V2 that is currently under developement. That just adds up to the confusion.
Then in some time, maybe someone will propose to switch to a name based version scheme, and so on, and so on... :)
Hugo V.
Hugo Villeneuve Hardware developer | Concepteur matériel Lyrtech Phone/Tél. : (1) (418) 877-4644 #2395 Toll-free/Sans frais - Canada & USA : (1) (888) 922-4644 #2395 Fax/Téléc. : (1) (418) 877-7710 www.lyrtech.com Infinite possibilities...TM