3 Apr
2018
3 Apr
'18
11:16 p.m.
"Tom" == Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com writes:
Hi,
That seems like a good idea to me.
I've lamented before (and I think others have too) that it's really a shame that gcc treats arm32 and arm64 as totally distinct builds (and where clang is a win). But I don't think we can require people to have both an arm and an aarch64 compiler available in order to build U-Boot for some aarch64.
No, please not. It would make it very hard to handle U-Boot builds in Buildroot for these boards.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard