On 16:46 Fri 03 Apr , Detlef Vollmann wrote:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 15:20 Fri 03 Apr , Eric BENARD wrote:
Detlef Vollmann a écrit :
Where can I find that patch?
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/56837
Thanks.
Is it interesting to loose time calculating PLL values at each boot when these value can be defined in the board config file ?
yes because you will not loose that much 1ms in the worse case but you will be sure about it evenif you change it in the at91bootstrap change or the lowlevel_init. It's safer
I probably agree. (Well, not completely, as I'd like to get rid of at91bootstrap completely and let U-Boot be the original boot code, but that's future.)
I've a patch that I'll send tomorow that boot the at91sam9263ek from NOR without the AT91bootstrap
Unfortunately that clock patch doesn't solve the timer issue, and makes it even worse... And I agree that it's not very useful to apply my old patch against that. The point is that I don't know against which git repository I should create any new patch. I'd prefer to use git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git, but I'm willing to use git://git.denx.de/u-boot-at91.git, but neither of those contain the clock patch yet...
I'll put in the clock branch
Best Regards, J.