On Friday 05 April 2013 01:38 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Sricharan,
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 12:44:45 +0530, Sricharan R r.sricharan@ti.com wrote:
Hi Albert,
On Friday 05 April 2013 12:36 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Sricharan,
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 11:24:34 +0530, Sricharan R r.sricharan@ti.com wrote:
So with OMAP added to multi platform kernel, the uImage no more contains a valid load address. With the uboot already supporting zImage, change the default boot command to bootz instead.
Acked-by: Nishanth Menon nm@ti.com Signed-off-by: Sricharan R r.sricharan@ti.com Tested-by: Nishanth Menon nm@ti.com
include/configs/omap4_common.h | 4 ++-- include/configs/omap5_common.h | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Is there a reason why this patch does not have history?
Amicalement,
I had a minor change only in these two from the series. So reposted only these two with 'in-reply-to' threads. If this is not the right etiquette, then should it be update/appended in the original patch ?
My question is not about the series but only about 5/5 which has no patch history after the commit message delimiter (---) whereas 4/5 has history.
If 5/5 has a minor change in V4, then it should have a history log indicating which minor change it was.
ok. 5/5 was just rebase on 4/5. Will add it though. Sorry for the miss.
Regards, Sricharan