
16 Jan
2012
16 Jan
'12
6:38 p.m.
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Heiko Schocher hs@denx.de wrote:
[snip]
diff --git a/board/ait/cam_enc_4xx/ublimage.cfg b/board/ait/cam_enc_4xx/ublimage.cfg index 95182ca..2374c72 100644 --- a/board/ait/cam_enc_4xx/ublimage.cfg +++ b/board/ait/cam_enc_4xx/ublimage.cfg @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ PAGES 6
# Block number where user bootloader is present # RBL starts always with block 1 -START_BLOCK 5 +START_BLOCK 0
Is the comment here still correct and fully explaining things? It's a little puzzling when I read it, but I don't have a good handle on the UBL stuff yet.
And aside from expecting a rework of some of this to match Wolfgang's comments about FIT images, the rest seems fine to me.
--
Tom