
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Scott Wood scottwood@freescale.com wrote:
On 08/13/2012 06:14 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Scott Wood scottwood@freescale.com wrote:
On 08/13/2012 01:10 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote:
Let's use the more appropriate udelay for the nand_spl. While we can't make use of u-boot's full udelay we can atl east use a for loop that won't get optimized away .Since we have the bus clock we can use the timebase to calculate wall time.
Looked at reusing the u-boot udelay functions but it pulls in a lot of code as well as depends on the gd struct and would require a lot of rework
What's wrong with depending on the gd struct?
Perhaps the wording is wrong a bit off. It's just pulling in other stuff and as you know we are very space constrained.
A struct definition doesn't take up space. Maybe you meant a dependency on certain specific code that puts things in the gd struct?
Correct.
@@ -123,6 +124,9 @@ ifneq ($(OBJTREE), $(SRCTREE)) $(obj)nand_boot.c: @rm -f $(obj)nand_boot.c ln -s $(SRCTREE)/nand_spl/board/$(BOARDDIR)/nand_boot.c $(obj)nand_boot.c +$(obj)../common.c:
@rm -f $(obj)../common.c
ln -s $(SRCTREE)/nand_spl/board/freescale/common.c $(obj)../common.c
endif
Why are you creating a link in the parent directory?
The typical build process picks out files needed for the build and symlinks them to nand_spl folder - or if building out of tree then it symlinks to the out of tree folder. This is true for all files in nand_spl as it currently exists not just this new file.
This is the first time I've seen a link go in $(obj)../ rather than $(obj)
It's because that's where the includes reference it. When building in tree, it does nothing because it can just reference the C file in the parent directory. When it's out of tree - we need to install the symlink in the proper location in the build folder.
-M