On 10/09/2018 09:05 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 4:49 AM Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
On 10/08/2018 08:26 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
This patch prevents disabling the FPGA bridges when SPL or U-Boot is executed from FPGA onchip RAM.
Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com
Changes in v2:
- use less ifdefs and more C code for address checks (but this gives a checkpatch warning because of comparing two upper case constants)
- changed comments
This patch depends on:
- CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE needs to be set to 0xC0000000 ideally this is done by moving SPL_TEXT_BASE to Kconfig: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/976918/
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h | 1 + arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc_gen5.c | 13 ++++++++++++- arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl_gen5.c | 10 +++++++--- 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h index bb9e3faa29..2725e9fcc3 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ #ifndef _SOCFPGA_BASE_ADDRS_H_ #define _SOCFPGA_BASE_ADDRS_H_
+#define SOCFPGA_FPGA_SLAVES_ADDRESS 0xc0000000 #define SOCFPGA_STM_ADDRESS 0xfc000000 #define SOCFPGA_DAP_ADDRESS 0xff000000 #define SOCFPGA_EMAC0_ADDRESS 0xff700000 diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc_gen5.c b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc_gen5.c index 429c3d6cd5..b35636b590 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc_gen5.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc_gen5.c @@ -177,6 +177,8 @@ static void socfpga_nic301_slave_ns(void)
void socfpga_sdram_remap_zero(void) {
u32 remap;socfpga_nic301_slave_ns(); /*@@ -187,7 +189,16 @@ void socfpga_sdram_remap_zero(void) setbits_le32(&scu_regs->sacr, 0xfff);
/* Configure the L2 controller to make SDRAM start at 0 */
writel(0x1, &nic301_regs->remap); /* remap.mpuzero */
remap = 0x1; /* remap.mpuzero */if (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE >= SOCFPGA_FPGA_SLAVES_ADDRESS &&CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE < SOCFPGA_STM_ADDRESS)We can detect where we're executing from at runtime, right ?
Sure, we can either read the 'pc' reg (are there predefined functions for this in the U-Boot sources?) or take the address of this function. Which one do you prefer?
__image_copy_start I think