On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Matthew McClintock msm@freescale.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Scott Wood scottwood@freescale.com wrote:
LAW init is skipped in the SPL payload because it's assumed that the SPL has taken care of it -- so make sure the SPL loads all the LAWs as is done on other boards.
It might be good to try this on a few different compilers to see if they are all under the size requirement. I've made this smaller from other work so it could still be OK.
Err, I spoke too soon... this might not be upstreamed though.
-M
-M
This bug was introduced by:
commit 4589728e214958a4e6e011a081a68d360c49d7a5 Author: Kumar Gala galak@kernel.crashing.org Date: Fri Nov 11 08:14:53 2011 -0600
powerpc/85xx: Fix builds of P1020/P2020RDB-PC_36BIT_NAND Size grew a bit so nand-spl didn't fit in 4k, reduce done by removing LAW entries not needed during SPL phase.Signed-off-by: Scott Wood scottwood@freescale.com
board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/law.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/law.c b/board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/law.c index 7968919..0da8300 100644 --- a/board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/law.c +++ b/board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/law.c @@ -25,13 +25,11 @@ #include <asm/mmu.h>
struct law_entry law_table[] = { -#ifndef CONFIG_NAND_SPL SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_CPLD_BASE_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_1M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC), SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PMC_BASE_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_64K, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC), #ifdef CONFIG_VSC7385_ENET SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_VSC7385_BASE_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_1M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC), #endif -#endif SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_BASE_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_64M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC), #ifdef CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_PHYS SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_1M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC), -- 1.7.9.5
U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot