Jon Loeliger wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 13:41, Larry Johnson wrote:
Would it be better to run Lindent on the original files, post those as changes, and then post a second patch with the new material?
In my opinion, yes, please.
BTW, I've noticed that the "Lindent -pcs" format is used inconsistently within files. Since I'm also making changes in Linux, it's hard to remember whether to type "foo(bar);" or "foo (bar);",
In my opinion, "foo (bar)" is bad style, and I prefer the Linux form, "foo(bar)".
jdl
Yeah, in Larry's patch, Lindent mostly created the 'bad-style' format. I thought the idea behind Lindent was that you didn't need to figure out all the appropriate switches for 'indent'. I don't know what '-pcs' does... Of course, my Lindent is old (c 2.6.19) and maybe it's been changed since then.
regards, Ben