-----邮件原件----- 发件人: Tim Harvey tharvey@gateworks.com 发送时间: 2025年1月1日 4:32 收件人: Alice Guo (OSS) alice.guo@oss.nxp.com; Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org 抄送: Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com; Stefano Babic sbabic@denx.de; Fabio Estevam festevam@gmail.com; dl-uboot-imx uboot-imx@nxp.com; Lukasz Majewski lukma@denx.de; Sean Anderson seanga2@gmail.com; Alper Nebi Yasak alpernebiyasak@gmail.com; u-boot@lists.denx.de; marex@denx.de; Alice Guo alice.guo@nxp.com; Ye Li ye.li@nxp.com; Peng Fan peng.fan@nxp.com 主题: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 16/17] imx95_evk: add i.MX95 19x19 EVK board basic support
Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report this email' button
On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 6:34 PM Alice Guo (OSS) alice.guo@oss.nxp.com wrote:
主题: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 16/17] imx95_evk: add i.MX95 19x19 EVK board basic support
I gave this series a go on top of 5cfbf8c364 origin/next on an EVK I have here and I saw no u-boot proper output after the ATF.
Here is what I saw on UART2: U-Boot SPL 2025.01-rc5-00393-g9b292f7d347f (Dec 27 2024 - 16:12:20 -0800) DDRMIX is powered UP Normal Boot Trying to boot from MMC2 Primary set selected Load image from MMC/SD 0xdec00 NOTICE: BL31: v2.10.0 (release):lf-6.6.52-2.2.0 NOTICE: BL31: Built : 16:06:15, Dec 27 2024
U-Boot SPL 2025.01-rc5-00393-g9b292f7d347f (Dec 27 2024 - 16:12:20 -0800) DDRMIX is powered UP Normal Boot Trying to boot from MMC2 Primary set selected Load image from MMC/SD 0xdec00 NOTICE: BL31: v2.10.0 (release):lf-6.6.52-2.2.0 NOTICE: BL31: Built : 16:06:15, Dec 27 2024 ^^^ nothing after this
Any thoughts on what is wrong here?
Best Regards,
Tim
Hi Tim,
I tried it on my MX95 and it works well, so I not sure what causes this issue on
your EVK.
Hi Alice,
I discovered what happened. The first make for uboot resulted in a binman warning (which should be a failure but is not for some reason) and results in an image that doesn't contain uboot proper: WARNING './u-boot.bin' not found, resulting binary may be not-functional
Simon, do you know why this warning doesn't result in a make failure?
Doing a second make works, so I think there is likely a binman dependency issue going on here. You can re-create the issue with a distclean as shown here:
COPY spl/u-boot-spl.bin SYM spl/u-boot-spl.sym CHECK spl/u-boot-spl.cfgout CHECK u-boot-container.cfgout WARNING './u-boot.bin' not found, resulting binary may be not-functional OBJCOPY u-boot.srec OBJCOPY u-boot-nodtb.bin RELOC u-boot-nodtb.bin CAT u-boot-dtb.bin COPY u-boot.bin SYM u-boot.sym MKIMAGE u-boot.img COPY u-boot.dtb MKIMAGE u-boot-dtb.img LDS u-boot-elf.lds LD u-boot.elf BINMAN .binman_stamp OFCHK .config -rw-r--r-- 1 tharvey Tim Harvey 922624 Dec 31 11:08 imx-boot-imx95.bin ^^^ image too small... missing u-boot.bin
$ make && ls -l imx-boot-imx95.bin UPD include/generated/timestamp_autogenerated.h CC common/version.o AR common/built-in.o LD u-boot OBJCOPY u-boot.srec OBJCOPY u-boot-nodtb.bin RELOC u-boot-nodtb.bin CAT u-boot-dtb.bin COPY u-boot.bin SYM u-boot.sym CC spl/common/spl/spl.o AR spl/common/spl/built-in.o LD spl/u-boot-spl OBJCOPY spl/u-boot-spl-nodtb.bin CAT spl/u-boot-spl-dtb.bin COPY spl/u-boot-spl.bin SYM spl/u-boot-spl.sym MKIMAGE u-boot.img MKIMAGE u-boot-dtb.img LD u-boot.elf CHECK u-boot-container.cfgout BINMAN .binman_stamp OFCHK .config -rw-r--r-- 1 tharvey Tim Harvey 1709056 Dec 31 11:10 imx-boot-imx95.bin ^^^ now we have a proper image
Best Regards,
Tim
Hi Tim,
When using "make distclean; make imx95_19x19_evk_defconfig; make", imx9_image.sh will delete the line "IMAGE A55 u-boot.bin CONFIG_TEXT_BASE" in container.cfg for i.MX95. I correct it in v3 and will send it later.
Best Regards, Alice Guo