Hi,
On 15 October 2014 18:38, Stephen Warren swarren@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 10/15/2014 09:39 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:34:49 -0600, Stephen Warren swarren@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 10/15/2014 05:43 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 23:14:24 +0000, Tom Warren TWarren@nvidia.com wrote:
Albert,
Please pull u-boot-tegra/master into ARM/master. Thanks!
The following changes since commit a7f99bf139b3aaa0d5494693fd0395084355e41a:
arm: Fix _start for CONFIG_SYS_DV_NOR_BOOT_CFG (2014-09-11 18:04:39+0200)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-tegra.git masterfor you to fetch changes up to 90a565acf3a18c61170ec0e0b2046c98cb7ecc85:
arm: tegra: initial support for apalis t30 (2014-09-17 11:15:04-0700)
Marcel Ziswiler (1): arm: tegra: initial support for apalis t30
Stephen Warren (1): ARM: tegra: add PCIe-related pins to the Jetson TK1 pinmux tables
This new board fails when I merge this branch to u-boot-arm/master, with the following diagnostics:
include/configs/apalis_t30.h:17:0: warning: "CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE" redefined [enabled by default] In file included from /home/albert.u.boot/src/u-boot-arm/include/linux/kconfig.h:4:0, from <command-line>:0: include/generated/autoconf.h:8:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
(actually, there is a lot of these, for various config options)
Device Tree Source is not correctly specified. Please define 'CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE' or build with 'DEVICE_TREE=<device_tree>' argument
(This one is fatal even though it does not explicitly state "error:")
This failure does not happen on the tegra branch; it is obviously due to the Kbuild stuff.
This issue should be fixed by:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/398793/ [U-Boot] tegra: apalis_t30: master revamp
However, I would assert that at this point during the release cycle, we probably shouldn't be adding new boards/features, but just fixing bugs. Perhaps we should drop the Apalis patch completely and re-apply it once the release is out?
Ok. Should I still apply the TK1 pinmux patch, or should I consider the whole PR to be for -next?
I consider the Jetson TK1 pinmux patch a bug-fix; it adds entries that always should have been there.
BTW the release has already gone out. Also what is the status of the Norrin patch? Will that go into Tegra soon?
Regards, Simon