24 Jan
2019
24 Jan
'19
9:04 p.m.
On 1/24/19 10:01 PM, Carlo Caione wrote:
On 24/01/2019 19:56, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
On 1/24/19 10:56 AM, Carlo Caione wrote:
It works for me, but I do have a question. Is there any limitation preventing you to add this functionality via the standard "mdio read x.y" instead of "mdio rmmd x.y" if the PHY is known to be C22?
You can used the standard "mdio read" but it's more verbose and hard to recall:
mdio write 0 0.d 0x3 mdio write 0 0.e 0x1 mdio write 0 0.d 0x4003 mdio read 0 0.e
vs
mdio rmmd 3.1
-- Carlo Caione
No, I mean instead of doing "mdio rmmd 3.1" to do "mdio read 3.1" (basically not define a new command).