On 06/04/2018 08:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 06:27:32PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 06/04/2018 02:59 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 11:36:00PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
Add option to the booti_setup() which indicates to it that the caller requires the image to be relocated to the beginning of the RAM and that the information whether the image can be located anywhere in RAM at 2 MiB aligned boundary or not is to be ignored. This is useful ie. in case the Image is wrapped in another envelope, ie. fitImage and not relocating it but moving it would corrupt the envelope.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com Cc: Bin Chen bin.chen@linaro.org Cc: Masahiro Yamada yamada.masahiro@socionext.com Cc: Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com
arch/arm/lib/image.c | 5 +++-- cmd/booti.c | 2 +- include/image.h | 4 +++- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/image.c b/arch/arm/lib/image.c index 1a04e2b875..08c7b8a54f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/lib/image.c +++ b/arch/arm/lib/image.c @@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ struct Image_header { uint32_t res5; };
-int booti_setup(ulong image, ulong *relocated_addr, ulong *size) +int booti_setup(ulong image, ulong *relocated_addr, ulong *size,
int ignore_ep)This should be 'bool' not 'int'.
Which blows up a couple of things, so to keep this patch small, it's int.
Can you elaborate please? Thanks!
Well, just try compiling it with bool, it'll choke on bool being undeclared on some boards which include the header.