Hi Keerthy,
On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 at 21:39, Keerthy j-keerthy@ti.com wrote:
On Thursday 03 January 2019 11:44 PM, sjg@google.com wrote:
On 12/21/18 9:24 AM, Keerthy wrote:
fix up fdtdec_get_addr_size to use fdtdec_get_addr_size_auto_noparent so that the address cells and size cells are obtained from the parent instead of going by the fixed length.
This patch makes perfect sense to me. However, I am worried about the potential existence of code that assumes the current fixed-size logic; in the past when fixing similar issues like this we've often run into code that was use "get addr" functions when it should have been using "get u32" functions and similar, which then broke when we fixed the implementation to do the right thing. I guess we should still apply the patch, and fix up any fallout as it appears.
Thanks Simon!
Unfortunately this breaks the tests (make qcheck). Can you please take a look?
Regards, Simon