Dear Jean-Christophe,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 17:29 Tue 21 Apr , Dirk Behme wrote:
From: Manikandan Pillai mani.pillai@ti.com Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme dirk.behme@googlemail.com Signed-off-by: Manikandan Pillai mani.pillai@ti.com
as Request precedently switch to 12Mhz source clock or
As answered already in (unanswered)
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050078.html
switch to 12MHz will have a larger code and implementation impact while we won't win anything compared to well tested 13MHz usage
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051258.html
please specify the timer resolution & precision of your implementation and put in the commit message & code
It seems to me that you mix here OMAP1 and OMAP3 patches?
I remember about
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051271.html
which is regarding arm925/OMAP1 changes, not OMAP3 patch. I can't remember anything similar regarding OMAP3 patch. And similar comment for OMAP3 patch wouldn't make sense as
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051178.html
has clear info
+ * We run the counter with 13MHz, divided by 8, resulting in timer + * frequency of 1.625MHz. With 32bit counter register, counter + * overflows in ~44min
Dirk