On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 07:50:46AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 09:07:42AM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
Hi,
LS(1021/1012/1028/1043/1046/1088/2088), LX2160 - updated device tree
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Jain gaurav.jain@nxp.com Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain priyanka.jain@nxp.com
[..]
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi index 50f9b527cd..c2a156ea8e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ /*
- NXP ls1028a SOC common device tree source
- Copyright 2019-2020 NXP
- Copyright 2019-2021 NXP
This will be removed again, because its not part of the kernel device tree.
*/
@@ -123,6 +123,45 @@ 0x82000000 0x0 0x40000000 0x88 0x40000000 0x0 0x40000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */ };
- crypto: crypto@8000000 {
compatible = "fsl,sec-v5.0", "fsl,sec-v4.0";fsl,sec-era = <10>;#address-cells = <1>;#size-cells = <1>;ranges = <0x0 0x00 0x8000000 0x100000>;reg = <0x00 0x8000000 0x0 0x100000>;interrupts = <GIC_SPI 139 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;dma-coherent;sec_jr0: jr@10000 {compatible = "fsl,sec-v5.0-job-ring","fsl,sec-v4.0-job-ring";reg = <0x10000 0x10000>;interrupts = <GIC_SPI 140 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;};sec_jr1: jr@20000 {compatible = "fsl,sec-v5.0-job-ring","fsl,sec-v4.0-job-ring";reg = <0x20000 0x10000>;interrupts = <GIC_SPI 141 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;};sec_jr2: jr@30000 {compatible = "fsl,sec-v5.0-job-ring","fsl,sec-v4.0-job-ring";reg = <0x30000 0x10000>;interrupts = <GIC_SPI 142 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;};sec_jr3: jr@40000 {compatible = "fsl,sec-v5.0-job-ring","fsl,sec-v4.0-job-ring";reg = <0x40000 0x10000>;interrupts = <GIC_SPI 143 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;};- };
While this one will collide with my DTB sync series [1]. I'd prefer to have my series merged first because then this patch will be unnecessary and I don't have to respin my series (yet again) because there were changes in the device tree in the meantime.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20211013161427.612033-1-michael@walle.cc/
Very much agreed with what Michael is saying here.
Me too. Priyanka, could you please take a look at Michael's patches?