On 22/10/2019 01:47, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Matthias,
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 03:57, Matthias Brugger matthias.bgg@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 05/09/2019 10:48, matthias.bgg@kernel.org wrote:
From: Matthias Brugger mbrugger@suse.com
The libftd implementation of U-Boot is outdated with the upstream project. Especially the default number of size-cells was wrong. This series fixes this by backporting the corresponding patches from the upstream project.
Changes since v1:
- fix spelling of U-Boot (patch 1 + 2 /4)
- add Reviewed-by tag (patch 1/4)
- fix the case of size-cells == 0 (patch 3/4)
- fix default address cells for livetree (patch 4/4)
v1 can be found here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1137331/ https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1137330/
Matthias Brugger (4): libfdt: fdt_address_cells() and fdt_size_cells() libfdt: return correct value if #size-cells property is not present libfdt: Allow #size-cells of 0 dm: Fix default address cells return value
include/dm/of.h | 2 +- scripts/dtc/libfdt/fdt_addresses.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++-------------- scripts/dtc/libfdt/libfdt.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
Any comments on this? I tried to find your custodian tree, but wasn't able to do so and check if you took it already.
This was applied. Did you not get the emails on each patch?
I got emails saying that they were applied to u-boot-dm/next, but wasn't able to find that branch.
Seeing it now, not sure if I didn't look correctly. Anyway thank for merging these fixes.
Regards, Matthias