On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 06:08:23PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
I pushed the TPM patches to a branch for you if you want to pick them up.
I ended up squashing the config patch into the others - since otherwise snow will not build for one commit. Does that seem acceptable or should I resend the whole series again?
Here are the original patches:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/sjg/tpm/
The following changes since commit d6639d10dbfa42dc888f8917012550b632a88959:
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-nand-flash (2013-05-31 18:28:47 -0400)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-x86.git tpm
for you to fetch changes up to 1b393db5870927d68c42a46e6c5877c8d0d83910:
tpm: Reorganize the I2C TPM driver (2013-06-03 01:31:23 -0700)
Che-liang Chiou (1): tpm: Rename generic_lpc_tpm to tpm_tis_lpc
Tom Wai-Hong Tam (2): x86: config: Reflect the name changes of LPC TPM configs tpm: Reorganize the I2C TPM driver
Vincent Palatin (1): tpm: Add support for new Infineon I2C TPM (SLB 9645 TT 1.2 I2C)
README | 18 +++- drivers/tpm/Makefile | 7 +- drivers/tpm/slb9635_i2c/compatibility.h | 51 --------- drivers/tpm/tis_i2c.c | 4 + drivers/tpm/{slb9635_i2c => }/tpm.c | 280 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- drivers/tpm/{slb9635_i2c/tpm.h => tpm_private.h} | 46 ++------ drivers/tpm/{slb9635_i2c => }/tpm_tis_i2c.c | 354 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ drivers/tpm/{generic_lpc_tpm.c => tpm_tis_lpc.c} | 0 include/configs/coreboot.h | 3 +- include/configs/exynos5250-dt.h | 6 +- include/fdtdec.h | 1 + lib/fdtdec.c | 1 + 12 files changed, 486 insertions(+), 285 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 drivers/tpm/slb9635_i2c/compatibility.h rename drivers/tpm/{slb9635_i2c => }/tpm.c (63%) rename drivers/tpm/{slb9635_i2c/tpm.h => tpm_private.h} (71%) rename drivers/tpm/{slb9635_i2c => }/tpm_tis_i2c.c (59%) rename drivers/tpm/{generic_lpc_tpm.c => tpm_tis_lpc.c} (100%)
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!